<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>neuro.me.uk &#187; writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuro.me.uk/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuro.me.uk</link>
	<description>Are you one-point-oh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Four Ubuntu Yorkshiremen</title>
		<link>http://neuro.me.uk/2009/03/22/the-four-ubuntu-yorkshiremen/</link>
		<comments>http://neuro.me.uk/2009/03/22/the-four-ubuntu-yorkshiremen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neuro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lugradio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuro.me.uk/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(With apologies to Monty Python) Four well-dressed men sitting together at a LUG meeting, surrounding a laptop running Ubuntu 9.04. First Yorkshireman (1Y): Ahh &#8230; Very passable, this, very passable. Second Yorkshireman (2Y): Nothing like a good install of Ubuntu Jaunty, eh Gessiah? Third Yorkshireman (3Y): You&#8217;re right there, Obediah. Fourth Yorkshireman (4Y): Who&#8217;d a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(With apologies to Monty Python)</em></p>
<p><strong>Four well-dressed men sitting together at a LUG meeting, surrounding a laptop running Ubuntu 9.04.</strong></p>
<p><strong>First Yorkshireman</strong> (1Y): Ahh &#8230; Very passable, this, very passable.</p>
<p><strong>Second Yorkshireman</strong> (2Y): Nothing like a good install of Ubuntu Jaunty, eh Gessiah?</p>
<p><strong>Third Yorkshireman</strong> (3Y): You&#8217;re right there, Obediah.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth Yorkshireman</strong> (4Y): Who&#8217;d a thought fifteen years ago we&#8217;d all be sittin&#8217; here recordin&#8217; a podcast usin&#8217; Jokosher on Ubuntu?</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>Aye. In them days, we&#8217;d a&#8217; been glad to have Slackware installed on t&#8217;hard disk.</p>
<p><strong>2Y: </strong>A beta of Slackware.</p>
<p><strong>3Y: </strong>Without network card or CD-ROM drive.</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>Or a hard disk!</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>In a filthy Packard Bell.</p>
<p><strong>3Y: </strong>We never used to have Packard Bell. We used to have to use RM Nimbuses.</p>
<p><strong>2Y: </strong>The best <em>we</em> could manage was to suck on a piece of a Sinclair QL.</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>But you know, we were happy in those days, though we were poor.</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>Aye. <em>Because</em> we were poor. My old Dad used to say to me, &#8220;Money doesn&#8217;t buy you operatin&#8217; systems.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>3Y: </strong>&#8216;E was right. I was happier then and I had <em>nothin&#8217;</em>. We used to use Yggdrasil Linux on an old Compaq with half of case missin&#8217;.</p>
<p><strong>2Y: </strong>Case? You were lucky to have a case! We used to have motherboards and components scattered about floor for &#8216;servers, all hundred and twenty-six of &#8216;em, no cable ties. Half the things were un-updated; we were all huddled together in one corner for fear of being DDoSed!</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>You were lucky to have updates! *We* used to have to hand-patch kernels every week!</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>Ohhhh we used to <em>dream</em> of hand-patching kernels! Woulda been a weight lifted to us. We used to infiltrate remote systems to snoop on the kernel to see what&#8217;d been changed the night before to reverse engineer t&#8217;changes back on our own kernels. Patches!? Hmph.</p>
<p><strong>3Y: </strong>Well when I say &#8220;patch&#8221; it was a hard copy of a diff printed on continuous paper with the green lines on it, but it were a patch to <em>us</em>.</p>
<p><strong>2Y: </strong>We stopped gettin&#8217; our hard copies; we had to fly to Finland and get Linus to transcribe bloody diffs onto notebooks!</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>You were lucky to have notebooks!  There were a hundred and sixty of us passing code changes across Europe by t&#8217;game of Chinese Whispers.</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>By phone?</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>Aye.</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>You were lucky. We lived for three months in a telephone exchange intercepting phone calls on the off-chance we&#8217;d catch your Chinese Whispers. We&#8217;d scratch the diffs onto nearby bits of copper wire, swallow &#8216;em and spend fourteen hours on bog trying to get em back again when we got home. Then our Dad would thrash us t&#8217;sleep with his copy of BYTE!</p>
<p><strong>2Y: </strong>Luxury.  We use to have to swim t&#8217;Finland at three o&#8217;clock in the morning, sneak up to Torvalds&#8217; house, spy on him until he typed in the bits we thought he was changing, scribble them down on newspaper and post them and ourselves back by DHL, come home, and Dad would beat us around the head and neck with a broken Tulip network card, if we were <em>lucky</em>!</p>
<p><strong>4Y: </strong>Well we had it tough.  We used to have to get up at twelve o&#8217;clock at night, figure out t&#8217;diffs by mental projection, <em>lick</em> t&#8217;diffs onto EEPROMs for 1,166 Swatch Internet beats, debug the compiler with a slide rule, and when we got home, our Dad would slice us in two with unsheathed Cat 5.</p>
<p><strong>3Y: </strong>Right.  I had to steal kernel diffs from you bastards, invent time machine, go back in time, give diffs to Torvalds to implement as the first version of the code instead of the twentieth, go forward in time, and find all the diffs already implemented in the kernel I got with Slackware, and when we got home, our Dad would kill us, and dance about on our graves singing the Free Software Song.</p>
<p><strong>1Y: </strong>But you try and tell the young people today that &#8230; and they won&#8217;t believe ya&#8217;.</p>
<p><strong>ALL</strong>: Nope, nope &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neuro.me.uk/2009/03/22/the-four-ubuntu-yorkshiremen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;&#8216;Iron Man&#8217;? That&#8217;s Kinda Catchy.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://neuro.me.uk/2008/05/03/iron-man-thats-kinda-catchy/</link>
		<comments>http://neuro.me.uk/2008/05/03/iron-man-thats-kinda-catchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neuro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[24fps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hero worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuro.me.uk/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing Iron Man last night, Robert Downey Jr. has firmly cemented himself into the canon of my &#8220;mostest awesome favourite actor types&#8221;. I&#8217;ve always liked Downey Jr. &#8212; highlights for me were his roles in Air America, Chaplin, and most recently, A Scanner Darkly, Good Night, and Good Luck and Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0371746/">Iron Man</a></em> last night, <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0000375/">Robert Downey Jr.</a> has firmly cemented himself into the canon of my &#8220;mostest awesome favourite actor types&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve always liked Downey Jr. &mdash; highlights for me were his roles in <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0099005/">Air America</a></em>, <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0103939/">Chaplin</a></em>, and most recently, <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0405296/">A Scanner Darkly</a></em>, <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0433383/">Good Night, and Good Luck</a></em> and <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0373469/">Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang</a></em>.  There&#8217;s a pattern in those roles: he excels at playing complete fuck-ups, mainly because his life in many regards has been one big long fuck-up.  He spent most of the 1990s in and out of both rehab and jail for repeated drug use and offences.  This guy knows more than most what it&#8217;s like to get on, and most critically to get <em>off</em> a substance abuse habit.</p>
<p>And that to me made him perfect to play <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Man#Origins">Tony Stark</a> in <em>Iron Man</em>.  The guy goes from arms dealing playboy to armour-clad philanthropist after seeing his life&#8217;s work being used by insurgents to kill innocent people (Vietnamese in the comics, Afghans in the movie).  Downey Jr. seems to have taken a similar path, seeing how fucked up his life was becoming, and now resuming a successful movie career.  For me, starring in <em>Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang</em> in 2005, alongside fellow career fuck-up Val Kilmer, was the first big &#8220;I&#8217;m back&#8221; statement he made.  <em>Iron Man</em> is his coming out party.  Holy crap, is Robert Downey Jr. back.</p>
<p>As for <em>Iron Man</em> itself, there&#8217;s a ridiculous amount of stuff to love in this movie, the first to be developed from scratch by Marvel itself: explosions, dogfights, great comedy, pathos, more explosions, no long-winded unrequired exposition pieces and &#8230; well, even more explosions.  It&#8217;s a balls-out, no-bullshit summer event movie, and it doesn&#8217;t give a shit about who knows it.  In fact, there&#8217;s actually quite a few key things that make this movie as great as it is &mdash; and it really shouldn&#8217;t be as great as it is given that the movie is shallow and predictable in places &mdash; Downey Jr. being the primary element both holding the feature together and driving it forward to a satisfactory ending.  In a nod to both Downey Jr.&#8217;s and director Jon Favreau&#8217;s comedy pasts, there was dialogue improvisation on set, partly due to an incomplete script, assisting in making this movie more believable on a human level.  Aside from that, a consistently good performances from the rest of the cast, taut direction from Favreau and utterly stunning visual effects from houses at the top of their game (ILM, Pixel Liberation Front, Stan Winston) combine to make this one of the strongest event movies in recent years.  And it really shouldn&#8217;t be.  It&#8217;s not a complaint, just an observation: the stars have some how aligned in such a way to make this movie great.  In lesser hands, perhaps, it would have floundered.</p>
<p>Combine all this with Downey Jr.&#8217;s appearance as Tony Stark in the forthcoming <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0800080/">The Incredible Hulk</a></em>, starring Edward Norton, and the tantalising promise of a series of Marvel Studios movies featuring other members of the Avengers &mdash; Captain America, Thor, Ant-Man &mdash; all leading to <a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=0&#038;id=49190">an Avengers ensemble movie</a> around 2010, and you have one of the most impressive and smart ways to build a franchise ever heard of in movies.  Good luck, Marvel: surprise us all and keep making these awesome comic-book movies!</p>
<p>Oh!  Tip: <strong>stay to the end of the end credits</strong>.  You&#8217;ll thank me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neuro.me.uk/2008/05/03/iron-man-thats-kinda-catchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
